Confidential compute
TEE / enclave isolation, measured launch, remote attestation, sealed state, and confidential inference when the selected hardware and runtime support it.
Software and AI products inherit the limits of their compute, data paths, runtime controls, security model, and operating boundaries. Those dependencies belong inside the product design, not outside it as late infrastructure work.
We design and qualify the surrounding stack so the customer can make deliberate tradeoffs about capacity, latency, isolation, portability, cost, and ownership.
For fleet-scale work, our provider qualification starts at 100+ GPU-capable nodes and evaluates the fabric, storage, scheduler, isolation, telemetry, support, reservation model, and expansion path around them.
100+ GPU-capable nodes in a coherent fleet
Dedicated or contractually reserved capacity
High-bandwidth east/west fabric
Checkpoint, dataset, artifact and model storage
Scheduler, quota and tenancy controls
Workload identity and tenant isolation
Fleet observability and failure telemetry
Capacity reservation and scale-out plan
Repair / replacement operating boundary
Portability and exit path
Device identity, boot, keys, source, build, dependencies, image, deployment, execution, update, repair, and revocation all become part of the product when the workload is sensitive.
TEE / enclave isolation, measured launch, remote attestation, sealed state, and confidential inference when the selected hardware and runtime support it.
HSM-backed key custody, TPM / secure-element class devices, device and workload identity, secure/measured boot, signed firmware, rotation, revocation, and recovery.
Encryption at rest and in transit, encryption in use where supported, mutual authentication, short-lived credentials, explicit key ownership, and crypto-agility.
Software and firmware inventory, transitive dependencies, source → build → image lineage, signing, verification, vulnerability mapping against the exact deployed version, and lifecycle visibility.
Isolated build environments, least-privilege build identities, controlled artifact promotion, release evidence, deployment provenance, and admission of approved signed artifacts.
Per-device identity, secure key/certificate provisioning, signed firmware/configuration baselines, device-to-build traceability, secure RMA, re-provisioning, and revocation.
When the product touches hardware, the design continues through component choice, board/firmware boundaries, thermal and mechanical constraints, manufacturing test, qualification, provisioning, serviceability, and lifecycle change.
Compute / silicon selection
Board and electronics design
Sensors, radios and interfaces
BSP, firmware and secure boot
Mechanical and thermal integration
Prototype builds
DFM / DFT
PCB fabrication and assembly
Contract-manufacturer qualification
Component sourcing and alternates
Environmental / reliability qualification
Production test and provisioning
Logistics and field spares
RMA / repair path
ECO and lifecycle management
The architecture, running state, change path, evidence, and operator surface should remain understandable as the product grows across services, models, data, infrastructure, and devices.
Compute, supplier, manufacturing, and security choices follow the customer outcome and workload rather than leading it.
Supplier, platform, hardware, and manufacturing decisions remain explicit so the customer understands cost, tradeoffs, substitution, and ownership.
Every critical supplier boundary gets requirements, acceptance criteria, evidence, failure ownership, and change control.
Portability, substitution, lifecycle, and exit paths are considered wherever they affect continuity, security, economics, or negotiating leverage.
Compute capacity, workload control, confidential execution, software provenance, portability, or a hardware and supplier boundary when the product requires one—start with what the product should become and the constraint standing in the way.